by Matthew Johnson | Jun 27, 2023 | Stay, Trial Institution
By Jessica Vedrani*, Misti Blount, and Matt Johnson – Congress implemented the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) to “establish a more efficient and streamlined patent system that [would] improve patent quality and limit unnecessary and counterproductive...
by John Marlott | Jun 21, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution
By John Marlott and Ryan Mueller – If a PTAB panel finds “compelling merits” of unpatentability when making its initial institution decision, is there any realistic chance that same PTAB panel will reach a different result in the final decision at the conclusion...
by Matthew Johnson | May 25, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently issued back-to-back Fintiv denials. The first denial issued on May 4, 2023. Read here about Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. California Institute of Tech., No. IPR2023-00130, Paper 10 (P.T.A.B. May 4, 2023). ...
by Matthew Johnson | May 18, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – The Board exercised discretion under § 314 to deny inter partes review in view of co-pending district court litigation. In the Institution Decision, the Board evaluated the Fintiv factors in light of the USPTO Director’s June...
by Carl Kukkonen | May 10, 2023 | PGR, Trial Institution
By Carl Kukkonen – In DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH et al v. QinetiQ Limited (PGR2023-00003), the petitioner filed its petition on the last possible day in the 9-month statutory period to timely file a petition for post-grant review (PGR). The certificate of...
by Matthew Johnson | Apr 5, 2023 | 325(d) issues, PGR, Trial Institution
By Levent Herguner and Matt Johnson – USPTO Director Kathi Vidal recently vacated a PTAB decision denying institution of a post-grant review and remanded the case for further proceedings. The petitioner challenged claims 1–27 of the ’274 patent under 35 U.S.C....
