by Matthew Johnson | Jan 19, 2022 | Trial Institution
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – This blog has previously discussed PTAB’s exercise of discretion under Section 325(d). Sometimes the PTAB has invoked Section 325(d) to deny institution; sometimes it has declined to apply Section 325(d) and instituted inter...
by Carl Kukkonen | Jan 4, 2022 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution
By Carl Kukkonen – On December 14, 2021, the PTAB instituted Post-Grant Review (PGR) for certain claims of U.S. Pat. No. 10,855,671 (the ‘671 Patent) in Netskope, Inc. v. Bitglass, Inc., PGR2021-00091 while, on the same date, denying institution of a PGR for...
by Matthew Johnson | Dec 8, 2021 | Trial Institution
By Lisa Furby and Dave Maiorana – Recently, Cloudflare Inc. succeeded in convincing the PTAB to institute in IPR2021-00969 against a Sable Network, Inc.’s patent directed toward data flow. While the institution itself is not out of the ordinary—the petitioner,...
by Joe Sauer | Nov 15, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Final Written Decisions, Trial Institution
By Stephanie Mishaga, Joseph Sauer, and Evan McLean – It is no secret that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) often leverages its discretionary denial powers to deny inter parties review (IPR) petitions. The PTAB has discretionarily denied IPR petitions,...
by Carl Kukkonen | Nov 1, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Trial Institution
By Carl Kukkonen – The Federal Circuit in AMC Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Fall Line Patents (Fed. Circ. September 30, 2021, op. 21-1051) held that the PTAB partially abused its discretion when upholding one claim of U.S. Patent No. 9,454,748 for which the patent owner...
by Albert Liou | Oct 29, 2021 | Trial Institution
By Alison Ibendahl and Albert Liou – In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution of inter partes review after accepting the Petitioner Microsoft’s stipulation to forego overlapping challenges in parallel district court proceedings...
