by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Apr 27, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
Typically briefing in a PTAB proceeding runs the following course: Petition; Patent Owner Preliminary; Response; Patent Owner Response; and Petitioner Reply. This is the pattern where no amendments are presented by the Patent Owner. When a motion to amend is...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Apr 6, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
On Friday, April 1, 2016, the Patent and Trademark Office issued the second amendment to the rules for trial practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. 81 Fed. Reg. 18750 (Apr. 1, 2016). The amendments to the PTAB’s rules of practice give patent owners more...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Mar 30, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC, IPR2014-01530, Final Written Decision, Paper 55 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 24, 2016). In IPR2014-01530, Amazon.com and Amazon Web Services, LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition to institute an inter partes review of claim...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Mar 30, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
A new video featuring Joe Sauer from the Jones Day PTAB litigation practice is on our PTAB Litigation blog site. The video covers the basics of PTAB litigation practice, including the different types of PTAB proceedings and their different standards. The video and...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Mar 9, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
In Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Hyperlync Technologies, Inc., 3-15-cv-02845 (NJD March 7, 2016, Order) (Cooper, J.), the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied, without prejudice, Hyperlync’s motion to dismiss on 35 USC § 101 grounds. The...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Feb 18, 2016 | PTAB Trial Basics
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG (Fed. Cir., Feb. 11, 2016). In Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, 2014-1719 (Fed. Cir., Feb. 11, 2016), Nike appealed the PTAB’s decision in IPR2013-00067 to deny their Motion to Amend the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,347,011 directed to methods...