by Matthew Johnson | Nov 23, 2020 | Motions Practice, PTAB News
By Hannah Mehrle* and Matt Johnson – NeuMoDx Molecular, Inc., (Petitioner) who was otherwise barred from pursuing two IPR proceedings regarding patents owned by HandyLab, Inc. (Patent Owner) under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)’s one year deadline, filed a Motion to Change...
by Matthew Johnson | Nov 19, 2020 | PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration
By Matt Johnson – The PTAB has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows the submission of an amicus request addressing a pending request for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) review. This form will enable interested parties to provide fast input on...
by Carl Kukkonen | Nov 16, 2020 | PTAB News
By Carl Kukkonen – A recent case in the Northern District of Illinois addressed the issue of collateral estoppel in connection with patents that were similar to those previously cancelled by the PTAB: In Think Prods., Inc. v. Acco Brands Corp., No....
by Matthew Johnson | Nov 5, 2020 | Joinder, PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – After being sued by Uniloc in April 2018 for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,467,088 (“Reconfiguration Manager for Controlling Upgrades of Electronic Devices”), Apple challenged claims 1-21 of that patent at the PTAB in October of that year...
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 30, 2020 | PTAB News, Time Limits
By Matt Johnson – Although infrequently awarded, district courts are empowered to issue sanctions for behavior at the PTAB that they deem “exceptional” under Octane Fitness. In Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Wargaming Group Limited, district court defendant and...
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 25, 2020 | PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – Total PTAB petitions remained flat in FY2020, with 1513 petitions total being filed: IPR (1429), PGR (64), and CBM (20), compared to 1464 in FY2019 and 1613 FY2018, down from 1901 in FY2017. September IPR petition filings were 4th highest for...
