by John Marlott | Aug 2, 2019 | CBMs, Patent Eligible Subject Matter
By John Marlott Is the little-used CBM patent review program the key to passage of § 101 legislation? Congress is currently considering legislation to drastically alter the patent eligibility statute, 35 U.S.C. § 101. The unabashed intent of the proposed legislation...
by David Maiorana | Apr 23, 2019 | CBMs, Patent Eligible Subject Matter
By Dave Maiorana On Thursday, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. IBG Interactive Brokers, LLC, No. 17-2257 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 18, 2019), that provides another data point on how CBM review works. Perhaps more...
by S. Christian Platt | Feb 20, 2019 | CBMs
By Jihong Lou and Christian Platt In a nonprecedential per curiam decision, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s final written decisions in five covered business method (“CBM”) reviews on four related e-trading patents as “arbitrary and capricious” because those...
by Carl Kukkonen | Jan 15, 2019 | CBMs, Patent Eligible Subject Matter
By Doug Clark and Carl Kukkonen Video game companies occasionally will take to the PTAB, seeking to invalidate each other’s patents. Mobile game developer Supercell Oy (petitioner) filed a Post Grant Review (“PGR) after learning that the USPTO issued U.S. Pat. No....
by David Maiorana | Nov 16, 2018 | 325(d) issues, CBMs
By Kait Crowder and Dave Maiorana Under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d), the PTAB has discretion regarding whether to institute a covered business method review if the arguments presented in the petition are the same, or substantially the same, as those previously considered by...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 26, 2018 | CBMs
By: Sean Benevento[1], Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson The PTAB recently clarified eligibility for a covered business method review (CBM). See Xerox Corp. v. Bytemark, Inc., No. CBM2018-00011 (P.T.A.B. July 12, 2018) (Paper 12). To establish standing for CBM review, a...
