by Tim Heverin | Dec 2, 2019 | CBMs, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Trial Institution
By Morgan Restaino and Tim Heverin Following guidance from the Federal Circuit, the PTAB has vacated a previous Board decision granting Covered Business Method review in Apple, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC (P.T.A.B. Dec. 3, 2018). The PTAB’s decision to...
by Tim Heverin | Nov 27, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal
By Emma Murray and Tim Heverin Last week, the Federal Circuit denied a motion to vacate and remand an IPR decision under Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. Issued on October 31, Arthrex held that the method for appointing PTAB Administrative Patent Judges...
by Tim Heverin | Dec 7, 2018 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Tim Heverin In September, the Patent Office revised Standing Operating Procedure 2 (available here) to create a new review path for designating opinions precedential or informational. See PTAB Litigation Blog discussion of SOP 2 here. Under the new...
by Tim Heverin | Dec 5, 2018 | Trial Institution
By Tim Heverin In a recent “same-party” joinder opinion, the PTAB broke with previous decisions to hold that it did not have authority under 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) to join new issues to an instituted IPR. Proppant Express Investments, LLC. V. Oren Technologies, LLC, Case...
by Tim Heverin | Oct 23, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics
By Tim Heverin Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF (N.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2018), reminds us that representations to the PTAB can have consequences in district court litigation, even outside the estoppel context. In the patent infringement...
