by Matthew Johnson | Oct 3, 2018 | Stay
By Matt Johnson District courts have discretionary authority to grant a motion to stay. Courts consider three factors in deciding how to exercise that discretion, the first being whether a stay will simplify the issues for trial. In Universal Secure Registry, LLC v....
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 10, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics
By: Tom Ritchie and Matt Johnson In Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Tech. v. iRobot Corp., IPR2018-00761, Paper 15 (PTAB Sept. 5, 2018), the PTAB denied institution of Shenzhen Silver Star’s IPR petition in view of an earlier challenge to the same patent by a...
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 3, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics
By: Susan M. Gerber and Matt Johnson In a recent PTAB decision, Petitioners learned the importance of addressing decisions from related IPRs when making arguments before the PTAB. Apple, Inc. and FitBit, Inc. v. Valencell, Inc., Case IPR2017-00319 (PTAB Aug. 6, 2018)...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 30, 2018 | Time Limits
By: Alex K. Chung Ph.D. and Matt Johnson In Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit found that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation does not reset the one-year...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 17, 2018 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit
In Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit found that the PTAB’s treatment of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation as resetting the IPR...
