PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
STRONGER Patents Act Being Introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives

STRONGER Patents Act Being Introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives

by David Maiorana | Mar 22, 2018 | Other News

By: Jaime Choi and Dave Maiorana On March 20, 2018, Reps. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio) and Bill Foster (D-Ill.) announced in an article that they would introduce the STRONGER Patents Act to the U.S. House of Representatives. More formally referred to as The Support...
Is The PTAB Bound By A Previous Federal Circuit Claim Construction?

Is The PTAB Bound By A Previous Federal Circuit Claim Construction?

by David Maiorana | Mar 12, 2018 | Claim Construction, PTAB Trial Basics

By: Dave Maiorana In previous posts, we have discussed whether the PTAB and the district courts can reach different conclusions on the same issue.  (See Fed Circ Affirms Conflicting Invalidity Determinations from District Court and PTAB; Can PTAB and Courts Reach...
PTAB Denies PGR Petition Due To Related Application

PTAB Denies PGR Petition Due To Related Application

by David Maiorana | Jan 21, 2018 | 325(d) issues

By Dave Maiorana By now, most PTAB practitioners are familiar with 35 U.S.C. § 325(d), which gives the Board the authority to deny institution of a post-grant proceeding because the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were previously presented to the...
The Federal Circuit Criticizes A PTAB Partial Institution

The Federal Circuit Criticizes A PTAB Partial Institution

by David Maiorana | Dec 13, 2017 | Federal Circuit, Trial Institution

By Dave Maiorana The PTAB’s practice of partially instituting IPRs has been in the news lately, with Jones Day recently arguing against that practice at the Supreme Court on behalf of the SAS Institute (“SAS”).  On December 5, 2017, the week after the Supreme Court...
PTAB Stays Reexamination in IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. v. Google LLC

PTAB Stays Reexamination in IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. v. Google LLC

by David Maiorana | Oct 23, 2017 | Stay

By Allison Haugen and Dave Maiorana In August 2016, Google petitioned for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,552,124 (owned by IXI Mobile), asserting that claims 1–10 are unpatentable.  In March 2017, the PTAB instituted the IPR as to claims 1–5, but denied...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.